CVE Database
Synced from NVD, cross-referenced against CISA KEV and EPSS · ordered by last update
| CVE ID | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by supplying a crafted template file to the devices route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by sending malicious input injected into the server username field of the import preconfiguration action in the API V1 route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by providing malicious input via the device hostname configuration which is later processed during system setup, resulting in remote code execution. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8.8 | A vulnerability was identified in Tenda F453 1.0.0.3. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formWrlsafeset of the file /goform/AdvSetWrlsafeset of the component httpd. Such manipulation of the argument mit_ssid_index leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.3 | The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.5 | The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.3 | The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by supplying a crafted firmware update file via the firmware update route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into requests sent to the restore route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the devices field when accessing the get setup route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8.6 | A vulnerability exists in Copeland XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, in which an unexpected return value from the authentication routine is later on processed as a legitimate value, resulting in an authentication bypass. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into OpenSSL argument fields within requests sent to the utility route, leading to remote code execution. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the devices field of the firmware update apply action. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into requests sent to the firmware update route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.5 | The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the request body sent to the contacts import route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the devices field of the firmware update action to achieve remote code execution. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the map filename field during the map upload action of the parameters route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8 | An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into requests sent to the templates route. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8.8 | A vulnerability was determined in Tenda F453 1.0.0.3. Affected is the function fromDhcpListClient of the file /goform/DhcpListClient of the component httpd. This manipulation of the argument page causes buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 8.8 | A vulnerability was found in Tenda F453 1.0.0.3. This impacts the function fromP2pListFilter of the file /goform/P2pListFilterof of the component httpd. The manipulation of the argument page results in buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.5 | Crypt::SysRandom::XS versions before 0.010 for Perl is vulnerable to a heap buffer overflow in the XS function random_bytes(). The function does not validate that the length parameter is non-negative. If a negative value (e.g. -1) is supplied, the expression length + 1u causes an integer wraparound, resulting in a zero-byte allocation. The subsequent call to chosen random function (e.g. getrandom) passes the original negative value, which is implicitly converted to a large unsigned value (typically SIZE_MAX). This can result in writes beyond the allocated buffer, leading to heap memory corruption and application crash (denial of service). In common usage, the length argument is typically hardcoded by the caller, which reduces the likelihood of attacker-controlled exploitation. Applications that pass untrusted input to this parameter may be affected. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.3 | The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.5 | The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.3 | The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.3 | The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.5 | The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.5 | The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.3 | The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests. |
| Exploit 2mo ago | 7.5 | The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or misrouting legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. |